fbpx A world of R&D: what changed since the 80s? | Science in the net

A world of R&D: what changed since the 80s?

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

In three decades the world can change of a lot. And it did: Cold War ended and several others started; new nations were born while globalisation kicked in. Yet one thing didn't seem to stop: growth of research. In the history of mankind there has never been as much scientific research as there is now, with millions of scientists and several thousands of institutions working every day. But if growth of science never stopped, it sure changed how science is done and – as important – how it is funded. OECD, in its “Science and Technology Indicators”, gathered data that goes back to 1981; they allow us to see, country by country, how much governments and industry invested in science. We present them in an interactive map.

 

 

Historically most countries have been pretty clear about science: either they like it or they don't very much. Expenditures in research rarely changed dramatically. One notable exception is South Korea, that from 2003 started to invest massively in this field. Today 4% of its GDP is directed towards scientific resarch: only Israel – a much smaller nation – devolves so many of its resources to science. Germany experience the opposite phenomenon: funds growth slowed from 1988. Yet today they are their peak, at 2,88% of GDP.

 

 

At the same time not all investments are created equal. There are countries like Argentina in which most of the funding comes from governmental sources and others where it's industry that pushes for science. Since 1981 the latter has become more common: industry-funded research grew generally at a much faster pace pretty in several countries. That is not the case for Italy and Spain, in which there is not much difference, in quantity, between the two funding sources.

 

 

Note: all data is provided by OECD. A spreadsheet with all relevant information has been compiled, and it's available here.


Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

Why have neural networks won the Nobel Prizes in Physics and Chemistry?

This year, Artificial Intelligence played a leading role in the Nobel Prizes for Physics and Chemistry. More specifically, it would be better to say machine learning and neural networks, thanks to whose development we now have systems ranging from image recognition to generative AI like Chat-GPT. In this article, Chiara Sabelli tells the story of the research that led physicist and biologist John J. Hopfield and computer scientist and neuroscientist Geoffrey Hinton to lay the foundations of current machine learning.

Image modified from the article "Biohybrid and Bioinspired Magnetic Microswimmers" https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/smll.201704374

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John J. Hopfield, an American physicist and biologist from Princeton University, and to Geoffrey Hinton, a British computer scientist and neuroscientist from the University of Toronto, for utilizing tools from statistical physics in the development of methods underlying today's powerful machine learning technologies.