fbpx An easy way to recreate experiments and learn science | Science in the net

An easy way to recreate experiments and learn science

Primary tabs

Read time: 1 min

Video Science is an educational app for iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch. It provides an easy way to bring science into real world with easy to recreate experiments. There are more than 70 experiments available, with new content being added regularly.

Video are divided on 10 categories: chemical change, density, engineering, gas laws, green engineering, heat transfer, old microscope, optics, physics of motion, and polymer chemistry.

Wifi connection required.

The video included in the app are also available on the VideoScience website.

Video and previews of the app:

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZWQj-J6y2k&sns=em]

videoscience 1 videoscience 2 videoscience 3 videoscience 4


Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.