fbpx A nice and useful app | Science in the net

A nice and useful app

Primary tabs

Read time: 1 min

Amongst hundreds of calculators available on the AppStore, Calculator HD + is one of the most attractive, especially because it is very use friendly. It has no more functions than those essential.

The app offer: high precision engine, result is displayed while typing the formula, multiple undo, switch between workspaces, persistent history, specialized keypad for iPhone and iPad, supports bluetooth, keyboard, right or left-handed mode, print easily with AirPrint and you can shere calculations history by e-mail.

Video tutorial and preview of the app:

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6NjX8t4uVw]

Calcolatrice HD+ fig 1 Calcolatrice HD+ fig 2 Calcolatrice HD+ fig 3 Calcolatrice HD+ fig 4


Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.