fbpx Latest worldwide climate information | Science in the net

Latest worldwide climate information

Primary tabs

Read time: 1 min

GeoOptics has launched the Climate Mobile 1.2 iPhone and iPad app for free to environmental enthusiasts and citizen scientists alike.

Climate Mobile provides up-to-date information on the global climate like temperatures, ice cover, atmospheric CO2, solar activity and weather reports. The app gives you access to data from international satellites and surface instruments, along with global temperature records from NASA and NOAA going back more than 130 years.

With Climate Mobile you can graph data, create charts, and compare variables with Climate Mobile’s built in tools. If you make a research breakthrough, you can email it to yourself. The app also offers educational tutorials, as well as tutorials to aid your data analysis.

Video overview and previews of the app:

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N5I6Z0xSew]

Climate Mobile fig 1 Climate Mobile fig 2

Premio giovani ricercatrici e ricercatori


Il Gruppo 2003 per la ricerca scientifica indice la quarta edizione del "Premio giovani ricercatrici e ricercatori edizione 2025" per promuovere l'attività di ricerca e richiamare l'attenzione delle istituzioni e dell'opinione pubblica sulle nuove generazioni di scienziate e scienziati.



prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.