fbpx ChemCam gets it right in one take! | Page 3 | Science in the net

ChemCam gets it right in one take!

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

The first brief analysis of data collected by Curiosity in the ChemCam test indicates that the instrument is working perfectly. A little mystery to be clarified, however, already cropped up.

A really excellent performance, to sum up the judgment of the Los Alamos National Laboratory's team who is directly responsible for managing ChemCam, the delicate instrument resulting from the French-American collaboration with the task of unravelling the secrets of Mars' rocks.The images of the experiment published by NASA are also quite significant According to statements by Roger Wiens, Principal investigator of the ChemCam team, the quality of the spectra collected by the tool is comparable to those collected during testing on Earth.

The first analyses of Coronation, the rock that was the first target of the ChemCam laser pulses on the Martian surface, indicate a substantially basaltic composition, thus in line with expectations. When the the first laser was flashed - and only in such circumstances - the spectra collected by the instrument, however, also identified an excess of magnesium and hydrogen. Even though it is necessary to wait for further analysis in order to be able to decipher this strange presence, a first hypothesis has already been advanced, which attributes the discovery to dust that covered the rock.

While waiting for the results, on Mars no time is being wasted and the next ChemCam target has already been identified: it is a group of rocks in the area hit by the retro-rockets of the rover at its landing and dubbed Goulburn.

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Mars

prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.