fbpx Climate and irrigation | Page 5 | Science in the net

Climate and irrigation

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

The analysis of two climate scientists indicates that the intensive use of irrigation techniques can in some regions temporarily counteract the effects of global warming.

In their research, just published in the Journal of Geophysical Research, Michael Puma (Columbia University) and Benjamin Cook (NASA Goddard Institute) investigated the impact exerted on climate by changes introduced in the last century in irrigation techniques and their more widespread use. It is known in fact that a greater amount of water released into the atmosphere both by evaporation and transpiration of crops, may have an effective chilling effect on the environment countering the effects of global warming.

The analysis shows that, while this influence is small at the global level (about a tenth of a degree), the impact is proving far more significant at the regional level, reaching a levelequivalent to that exercised - obviously in the opposite direction - by greenhouse gas. The most important influence is recorded in the basin of the Indus River, where irrigation can reduce warming by even 3 °C.

In addition,the study suggests that irrigation affects climate also in other ways, such as causing an increase in the level of annual precipitation in regions that are downwind with respect to the most intensively irrigated regions. Finally, there is the suspicion - but more detailed studies are needed for confirmation - that the distribution of monsoon rains may also be affected.

Columbia University

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Climatology

prossimo articolo

Approved the law for the restoration of European nature, but it's a half victory

On November 9, the European Council approved the Nature Restoration Law, a regulation for the restoration of ecosystems. A much-hoped-for victory that leaves a bitter taste: the adopted regulation emerges from more than a year of negotiations that have significantly weakened it in substance. The risk is that the objectives lose their concreteness in implementation.

Crediti foto Boris Smokrovic su Unsplash

On November 9, the European Council, the body defining the EU's policy directions, approved the Nature Restoration Law, one of the four main pillars of the European biodiversity strategy for 2030. A great achievement, yet leaving a bit of bitterness, considering the approved regulation was significantly weakened compared to the original.