fbpx Teaching genetics | Page 4 | Science in the net

Teaching genetics

Primary tabs

Read time: 1 min

It is possible to teach genetics in such as way as to gain students' interest. Yes, but a different approach is needed. This is the opinion of Rosemary J.Redfield, who teaches genetics at the Department of Zoology at the Canadian University of British Columbia, as stated in an article published in Plos Biology in July. The paper proposes a new way of teaching basic genetics, more suitable for students of the 21st century.

Why students who attend the course of basic genetics do not improve their ability to think scientifically and keep on not understanding much about genetics? Are they more stupid, more lazy? No, says Rosemary, it is us, the teachers, who are wrong in teaching a subject that students will never use. The role of genetics today has changed, genes are a bit everywhere with strong implications for both public and personal life. We therefore need to experiment with a new way of teaching genetics, getting rid of the old and pedantic structure of textbooks and enriching courses with topical issues: are cloned animals ethical? Are GM foods harmful? Does it make sense to speak of races?

At the end of the article readers can continue the discussion by describing their own experience and making suggestions by "clicking" on "Comments".(A.G.)

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Indice: 
School

prossimo articolo

President Trump reshapes US research landscape

trump

Con una serie di ordini esecutivi, Donald Trump smantella le politiche climatiche di Biden e ritira gli Stati Uniti dall'accordo di Parigi. Le agenzie federali scientifiche (EPA, NIH, CDC, FDA, NASA) vengono ristrutturate con nuove nomine orientate alla deregolamentazione. Vengono congelate le assunzioni federali, mentre la revisione delle collaborazioni internazionali potrebbe ridefinire il ruolo USA nella ricerca globale. Immagine: Donald Trump.

20 January 2025 marks a turning point in US science policy, with a series of executive orders drastically redefining the role of federal science and research agencies. A detailed analysis of the documents reveals an approach that fundamentally changes the basis of US climate, energy and biomedical research policy.

This comprehensive list shows the scope and breadth of the first day's interventions, which touch virtually every aspect of the federal government, from foreign policy to national security, from energy to immigration, from administrative reform to social policy.