fbpx Who are the most influential scientists? Here is the ranking | Page 17 | Science in the net

Who are the most influential scientists? Here is the ranking

Read time: 2 mins

The multinational media and information firm Thomson Reuters carried out an analysis of scientific production in the last eleven years, in order to identify the world’s most influential scientific minds. This work was based on data from the Web of Science platform, produced and maintained by Thomson Reuters’ experts, which gathers citation indexes from scientific literature – journals, conference proceedings, abstract, etcetera – grouped based on the related discipline.

Analyzing these databases allowed to identify those researchers whose papers were the most cited for each of the 21 scientific broad fields. They are 3200, with a strong preponderance of Americans, except for some fields such as environment/ecology or plant and animal sciences. There are 55 Italians included in the list and only 5 of them are women.

Within this collection of most highly cited researchers is a small subset of individuals who have published the greatest number of the so-called hot papers, which are the papers with higher impact in a specific field, during 2012-2013. Such a list is headed by Stacey B. Gabriel, who signed 23 hot papers and works, as the majority of the members of this list, at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. All the scientists in this list work for US institutions, the only exceptions being two persons working in the UK and two working in China. The roster featured an outstanding concentration of biomedicine researchers (12 out of 17), with physical sciences gaining the second place.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Research

prossimo articolo

Epidemic: from reality to fantasy

Comparing the Covid-19 pandemic with two pandemics from literature: “The White Plague” by Frank Herbert and “Station 11” by Emily St. John Mandel

Epidemics is an often recurring theme in world literature, where authors share with us their realistic and unrealistic version of them. I recently read two books with global plagues in them: “The White Plague” by Herbert (1982) and “Station 11” by St. John Mandel (2014). These books came to mind at the outbreak of the new coronavirus epidemics, and I was reminded of the traits of their own epidemics and how puzzled they had left me. I will not compare these three diseases scientifically, as that would be impossible.