fbpx Europe open letter education | Page 14 | Science in the net

Europe open letter education

Read time: 3 mins

Two international events are taking place in these days in Luxembourg. Aim of these events is to remind the importance of clinical trials in order to foster communication in clinical research. One of the objective of the International Clinical Trials' Days is to increase European citizens’ awareness on topics that, as it often happens, suffers from a gap between their impact on daily life and health, and their effective knowledge by the general public.

ECRAN (European Communication on Research Awareness Needs) is a project funded by the European Community, it is part of the organization of the event celebrated on May 20 and is also the promoter of the movie about James Lind, the physician to whom the performing of the first clinical trials are attributed.

In order to begin educating about the importance of clinical trials since the younger ages, on the project website an open letter to European Ministers for Education has been published. Aim of the letter is to ask the introduction of the teaching of clinical research in scholastic programs in secondary schools.

Here is the letter, while the plea may be subscribed by filling in this module.

 

To all European Ministers of Education; European Heads of Schools; European Teachers; and Parents.

Introduction to clinical research as part of the school education for all European school pupils for three consecutive years around the ages of 14, 15, and 16 years. 



As a coalition of patient organisations, physicians, health researchers, and health journalists we are concerned that public general knowledge about clinical research is very sparse, and virtually absent about why independent randomised clinical trials are needed. Most people will encounter clinical research for the first time when they or relatives are invited to participate in randomised clinical trials or other types of clinical research. This invitation often follows devastating news of the diagnosis of a serious health problem. We propose that steps should be taken to equip European citizens with information and understanding which will help them deal effectively with the challenges in such situations. We want patients and their relatives to become better equipped to withstand the blows of a serious diagnosis followed by an invitation to participate in clinical research designed to deal with uncertainties about the relative merits of alternative management strategies.

PWe propose that all schools introduce as part of their curriculum, three 2-day education workshops on the theme of clinical research over three consecutive years. The education should be provided before high-school as part of the curriculum for pupils around 14 to 16 years old, and be implemented from the educational year 2015 to 2016. Local rules could require other ways to introduce clinical research into the curriculum.


The three 2-day workshops should become increasingly complex, but they should always aim to ensure basic understanding of the reasons why diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic, and care decisions need to be based on reliable evidence; recognition of sources of bias and the development over time of methods to avoid these; and the rationale for independent clinical research.

We have a number of ideas for topics and materials that can be used for such educational workshops, encompassing material and tools from the ECRAN project (http://ecranproject.eu/); Testing Treatments interactive (http://www.testingtreatments.org/); The James Lind Library (http://www.jameslindlibrary.org/); The Cochrane Collaboration (http://www.cochrane.org/); The Cochrane Library (http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/view/0/index.html); and ECRIN (http://www.ecrin.org/). We would be happy to contribute to a more detailed curriculum for the European pupils. We would also suggest scientific assessments of the educational tools’ effects on knowledge.

A well prepared European population will make the population more open to clinical research through understanding the necessities and complexities of clinical research. That would help all European citizens, including the health sciences, healthcare systems, and the drug and device industries.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Events

prossimo articolo

Europe votes on the new air quality directive

The European Parliament's vote (and subsequently the Council of Europe's) on the new European Directive on air quality is expected for September 13. This directive updates the allowed atmospheric pollutant limits, bringing them closer to those established by the WHO in 2021. Resistance to the new objectives, mainly coming from the industrial world and established economic interests in certain regions, makes the outcome of the vote uncertain. However, there are no serious scientific or political reasons to oppose or attempt to dilute the more ambitious limits proposed by the new directive.

Image credits: JC Gellidon/Unsplash

The new European Directive on air quality, currently under discussion in the European Parliament, updates the concentration limits of major air pollutants, bringing them closer to those set by the new guidelines of the World Health Organization (2021). The outcome of the vote, scheduled for September 13, is uncertain.