fbpx Teaching genetics | Page 9 | Science in the net

Teaching genetics

Read time: 1 min

It is possible to teach genetics in such as way as to gain students' interest. Yes, but a different approach is needed. This is the opinion of Rosemary J.Redfield, who teaches genetics at the Department of Zoology at the Canadian University of British Columbia, as stated in an article published in Plos Biology in July. The paper proposes a new way of teaching basic genetics, more suitable for students of the 21st century.

Why students who attend the course of basic genetics do not improve their ability to think scientifically and keep on not understanding much about genetics? Are they more stupid, more lazy? No, says Rosemary, it is us, the teachers, who are wrong in teaching a subject that students will never use. The role of genetics today has changed, genes are a bit everywhere with strong implications for both public and personal life. We therefore need to experiment with a new way of teaching genetics, getting rid of the old and pedantic structure of textbooks and enriching courses with topical issues: are cloned animals ethical? Are GM foods harmful? Does it make sense to speak of races?

At the end of the article readers can continue the discussion by describing their own experience and making suggestions by "clicking" on "Comments".(A.G.)

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Indice: 
School

prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.