fbpx Animalists against Garattini, solidarity from the Group 2003 | Science in the net

Animalists against Garattini, solidarity from the Group 2003

di Gruppo 2003
Pubblicato il 05/09/2013Read time: 3 mins

Science is an essential – If not predominant – component of contemporary culture. Yet, nowadays, some Italian politicians want to deny the right to speak in public to one of the world's most respected Italian scientist, Silvio Garattini. His fault is that of telling the truth about animal experimentation: Garattini always reminded that it is impossible to get along without experimentation on living beings if we want to keep researching new treatments, such as those against cancer. He also highlighted that the new law approved by the Italian Parliament on July 31, by interpreting in a restrictive way the 2010/63/UE Directive from the European Parliament, prevents researchers from doing their job properly in this country. The same statements have been repeated by all the most authoritative scientific exponents, national and international.

Good moral reasons may be advanced against experiments on animals, as long as you are willing to forgo the benefits they produce. It is unethical, however, to affirm the opposite of the truth, such as that animal experimentation is useless for the advancement of medicine, has no health benefit, and may always be replaced by other methods.

Such a reversal of reality was already an alarming indication of a regression in the public debate by itself, but now we have come to a point where the organizers of the Sarzana Festival della Mente have been warned to not allow Garattini (invited to talk on a topic that does not relate to animal experimentation) to speak in public, simply because "unwelcome."

The threat to boycott Garattini’s participation to the Sarzana Festival put at stake something that goes beyond the issue of animal experimentation and of science itself: it is a matter of freedom of expression and respect for the rules of democratic and civilian confrontation, in a country that must not surrender to populism and to any kind of compliance towards attempts to gag an opposing opinion.

The Group 2003 for Scientific Research condemns this attack on freedom of thought and expresses full solidarity to Silvio Garattini and gratitude for his commitment. It also reminds that every man of science has a duty towards society: reporting the truth he knows, even if unpleasant to a part of public opinion. Finally, the Group calls on all political representatives to intervene, in order to ensure the necessary freedom of thought and to bring the debate on animal experimentation in the context of fairness and knowledge.

 

The Group 2003 for scientific research

Drafted and approved by:

Maria Pia Abbracchio
Giabfranco Balbo
Vincenzo Balzani
Alessandro Bressan
Franco Brezzi
Giuliano Buzzetti
Ernesto Carafoli
Cesare Chiosi
Mario Clerici
Domenico Ferrari Cesena
Rocco De Nicola
Gaetano Di Chiara
Giovanni Dosi
Brunangelo Falini
Eleuterio Ferranini
Filippo Frontera
Gabriele Ghisellini
Isabella Gioia
Carlo La Vecchia
Giuseppe Mancia
Tommaso Maccacaro
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Alberto Mantovani
Laura Maraschi
Marco Ajmone Marsan 
Attilio Maseri
Ugo Montanari
Gino Nicolais
Giorgio Parisi
Riccardo Patacchini
Rino Rappuoli
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Alvio Renzini
Giacomo Rizzolatti
Sergio Romagnani
Maria Grazia Roncarolo
Nicoletta Sacchi
Paolo Santicioli
Roberto Satolli
Silvano Sozzani
Luigi Stella 
Guido Tabellini 



If you want to subscribe the appeal from Group 2003, send an email to: [email protected]


Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

Discovered a New Carbon-Carbon Chemical Bond

di Chiara D'Errico
Pubblicato il 16/10/2024

A group of researchers from Hokkaido University has provided the first experimental evidence of the existence of a new type of chemical bond: the single-electron covalent bond, theorized by Linus Pauling in 1931 but never verified until now. Using derivatives of hexaarylethane (HPE), the scientists were able to stabilize this unusual bond between two carbon atoms and study it with spectroscopic techniques and X-ray diffraction. This discovery opens new perspectives in understanding bond chemistry and could lead to the development of new materials with innovative applications.

In the cover image: study of the sigma bond with X-ray diffraction. Credits: Yusuke Ishigaki

Chemistry

After nearly a year of review, on September 25, a study was published in Nature that has sparked a lot of discussion, especially among chemists. A group of researchers from Hokkaido University synthesized a molecule that experimentally demonstrated the existence of a new type of chemical bond, something that does not happen very often.